Citroen C1 VTi 68 Feel (2017) tarkastelu

täytäntöönpanonopeudetValmistusvuosiHankintahintaKM-tilassa ostaessaanmittarilukema viimeinen
C1 VTi 68 Feel
5, Manuaalinen
2017
2017
10 km
3600 km
Disclaimer MyReview

Kuvaukset ja kommentit jaksossa Myreview auto perustuu henkilökohtaisia ​​mielipiteitä ja kokemuksia käyttäjille. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV (Jäljempänä Sanoma) ei ole vastuussa sisällöstä tai mahdollisista seurauksista. Vuonna Myreview auto sijoitetaan sekä hyviä että huonoja kokemuksia. Toimittajat voivat ilmaisuja, jotka eivät täytä menettelytapaohjeet tai laittoman muokata tai poistaa koko ajan.

Se ei ole sallittua ilman lupaa Sanoma käyttää tietoja Myreview Automaattinen tai leviävät muihin tiedotusvälineisiin.

Täyttää hieno, maksaa vähän - mutta -

  • 3600 km
  • 30 heinäkuu 2017 20:50

Joiden työpaikka on mahdollisuus kävely / pyöräily päässä, mutta meillä joskus on (epäsäännöllinen) tarvitsevat autoa pohti hyväksyä diskontattu Citroen C1.

Toisin kuin aikaisemmat autoja, toisin kuin Volvo 850 2.5 meillä oli täällä. Pitäen mielessä: Pieni kulutus, alhaiset kustannukset, vähän huoltoa ja tarpeeksi mukavuutta täällä Hollannissa sanoimme kyllä ​​ja vähän myöhemmin C1 kadulla.

Laitteet / käytännön
Ilmastointi, Bluetooth, sähköiset ikkunat, radio, Privacy Glass on lähes kaiken, mitä voi toivoa. Vakionopeussäädin ja sähkökäyttöisiä peilit Kaipaan melkoisesti.

Istuimet ovat todella hienoja ja päivittäistavarat & pienet pussit sopivat täydellisesti tavaratilaan. Ohjausryhmä ei päästä teitä eikä oikeastaan ​​säätää pitkälle ylös tehden hieman vähissä jalat on kanssamme.

ratsastaa
Pieni auto, mielestäni C1 erittäin kypsä. 130 maantiellä, myös pitempiä ei todellakaan ole hyvin raskasta ja epämukavaa. Hän tekee lähettää valoa, mutta ei niin synkkä kuin uusi Twingo jossa on ajanut (tämä löysin sattumalta kokonaisuudessaan valtava takaisku, paitsi ulkonäkö). Kytkentä, yhteys, jarrutus vain kaikki on hyvin helppoa. Keskimääräinen kulutus asti mitattuna pumppu on 1: 19,3 ensimmäisen 3500 km. Tämä on myös käynnissä-in, ilmastointi ja +/- 130 maantiellä, jossa se voi. Ole hullu!

Oletko mukana kaksi tai kolme ihmistä, ja jotkut matkatavaroiden aluksella, on tuulta niinkuin huomaat: Alankomaat, tämä auto on hieno, mutta hän tulee vallan puute todella aikoo lähteä lomalle. Eikö tämä mene Etelä-Ranskaan tai ski ratsastaa. Siellä, Citroën / Toyota / Peugeot'm myöskään suunniteltu.

Ongelma?
Mitä vain hyvin ikävää, säännöllisin nopeuksilla alle 80-100 km / h moottorin nykimistä. Toisinaan melko väkivaltainen liikaa, varsinkin välillä 40 ja 80 tämä on erittäin ärsyttävää. Ymmärrän, että moottori ei ole yhtä sujuvaa kuin 2,5-litrainen viisisylinterinen edellisestä auton, mutta et odota. Luin useita paikkoja, että tämä on uusi Euro 6 moottoria. Minulla on yli kuusi kuukautta ennen C1 tulivat koeajo on Aygo ja oli tämä ei sokki, ajattelen minua nyt, valitettavasti, että se saattaa silti olla vanha - ollut moottori - ei järkyttävää. Toivon vielä löytää ratkaisu.

C1 kuin sitä kovasti, mutta järkytys häiritsee minua kovasti. Olemme jo Euro98 BP ja Shell V-Power kännissä mutta tämä ei auta lainkaan. Laitan päivityksen, jos on!

* Sisältää 2 shokin vuoksi, luotettavuus laittaa tarpeeksi, enkä voi arvioida.

3.5
  • Comfort 3.0
  • suorituskyky 2.0
  • luotettavuus 3.0
  • maksavat 5,0
  • Ostaisitko auton tämän merkin? ehkä

Anna mielipiteesi kirjoitustyylin ja käytettävyyttä. Ainakin viisi sai arvosanat keskimääräinen arvio näytetään.

  • huono
  • riittämätön
  • tarpeeksi
  • hyvä
  • erinomainen

Opel Astra Vuoden auto 2016!

145Trotse kasvoja Opel. Astra on itse asiassa äänestettiin Vuoden Auto Euroopassa 2016!

Organisaatio takana kansainvälisen Car of the Year-palkinnon, Opel Astra valittiin vuoden autoksi (Car Of Thei YKorva / COTY) 2016. Joulukuussa Audi A4, BMW 7-sarja, Jaguar XE, Mazda MX-5, Opel Astra, Skoda Superb ja Volvo XC90 jäi finalistit. 

Opel Astra oli 309 pistettä voittaa saat mennä. Hän jätti Volvo XC90 ja Mazda MX-5 toisella ja kolmannella sijalla jäljessä vastaavasti 294 ja 202 pistettä. Kaikki ehdokkaat on oltava uusia autoja, jotka julkaistiin ennen vuoden 2015 vähintään viidessä Euroopan maassa listoilla. 

Viime vuonna Volkswagen Passat onnistui loppuun ensimmäiselle sijalle. Toinen päättyi Citroën C4 Cactus ja kolmanneksi tuli uusi Mercedes C-Class sisällä.

Luonnossa: T-Ford (1919)

41Vandaag ylivoimaisesti vanhin osallistuja tässä osiossa! Kiitos AutoWeek lukija Rolf Mak viikolla meillä on T-Ford 1919 lavalla!

Ford Model T - joka tunnetaan myös Fordin T - voidaan pitää ensimmäisenä 'saavutettavissa' auto. Henry Ford täydelliseksi kokoonpanolinjalla, jonka tuotantokustannukset voidaan vähentää merkittävästi. Jossa autot aiemmin puhtaasti rikkaiden tarkoituksena oli Ford Model T tarjotaan keskiluokkaan. Muutaman päivän kuluttua paljastus mallin jo 15000 tilauksia tehtiin.

T-mallin tuotettiin välillä 1908 ja 1927. Tämä kappale on peräisin vuodelta 1919 ja se on todettu maassamme vuodesta 2010. Konepellin alla - kuten kaikki Model T: n - 2,9-litrainen nelisylinterinen mittaus, hyvä 20 hp. Joskus ajatellaan, että T-mallin Fordin ensimmäinen auto oli, mutta malleja kuten mallissa A, malli N ja S edelsivät häntä. Sen jälkeen, kun T-mallin Henry muuten jälleen alkoi kirjaimella A, koska hän katsoi, että uusi malli oli niin innovatiivinen, että hän halusi aloittaa tyhjästä. Kaikkiaan noin 15 miljoonaa T mallit tuotettu.

T-Ford ...

  • Tunnen fantastinen
  • Tunnen aika hauskaa
  • ei tee minulle paljon
  • En löydä mitään, mutta
  • Tunnen kauhea
Äänestä Näytä arkisto

T-Ford ...

  • Minusta fantastinen 76,6%
  • Tunnen aika hauskaa 16,5%
  • En ole paljon 4,8%
  • En löydä mitään, mutta 0,7%
  • Tunnen kauheaa 1,4%
Numero stemmen727Bekijk arkisto

Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) tekniset

Opel Lotus OmegaOpel Lotus OmegaVuonna 1990 Opel esitteli näyttäviä Lotus Omega. Kuten nimi kertoo, supernopea sedan kehitettiin entisen GM tytäryhtiö Lotus. Aivan kuten entinen Fordin Lotus Cortina Lotus Omega on yhdistettävä suorituskykyä urheiluauto, jossa on tilaa neljälle hengelle. Perusta on muodostettu Omega. Opel-kuusi-sylinterinen on lävistää Lotus teknikot 3,6 litraa ja joka on varustettu kahdella turboahdinta jäähdyttäen. Raskaiden kuusivaihteinen vaihteisto tulee myös Lotus-kehitetty Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1. Lotus Omega on valtava ulkopuolella, koska suuri spoilerit edessä ja takana, pyöräkoteloiden ja helmat. Myös erityisiä pyörät on asennettu. 24-venttiilinen moottori työntää peräti 377 hevosvoimaa. Siten yläosassa Lotus Omega on alle 5,5 sekuntia 100 km / h, on peräti 280 km / t (eli Opel kyllä ​​pitää Porsche herrasmiessopimukseen että saksalaiset autot eivät ole nopeammin kuin 250 km / h run) . Lotus Omega on siten suora kilpailija hillitymmän tyylitelty BMW M5 ja Mercedes 500E. Britanniassa, auto tulee kuin Vauxhall Lotus Carlton. Vuonna 1992 esirippua nopeimman Opel aikojen jälkeen 950 yksikköä rakennetaan.Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) tekniset

Erittelyt Opel Lotus Omega

tyyppi-
rakentaminen Vuosi1990-1992
rakentaa6 cil., Line
siirtymä3615 cc
polttoainebensiini
ajotakana
teho377 hv / 5200 rpm
pari568 Nm / 4200 rpm
pituus468 cm
leveys193 cm
korkeus143 cm
akseliväli273 cm
massa1663 kg
Huippunopeus280 km / t
kiihtyvyys5,4 s
hinta-
tuotannon määrä950
Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) tekniset Lisää Opel Lotus Omega:tekniset tiedot| Tilaisuudet| malli PageLisää Opel:brändisivuja

Opel Agila 1.0-12V Comfort (2001) review

2PerformanceSpeedsYear BuiltYear of purchaseMileage last
Agila 1.0-12V Comfort
5, Manual
2001
2001
9630 km
Average reader rating: 6.4 Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

EXPERIENCES

  • May 13 2007 00:00

When our Volkswagen Golf S 5 door 1980 was rejected in 2001, we were really looking for another car. A small car was preferred. And since small cars 2nd hand relatively expensive to purchase are we looked for a new one. And when we walked into this Opel Agila bump ... Not nice, not quickly but what a room. And since we are not small people is still in its price a one of the most spacious cars. The agila is iedentiek the Suzuki Wagon R. The reason we had bought one because the Agila Suzuki Wagon R (then) if 1.0 was available and that made it too expensive. We bought raised him in time because the car is a few months after our purchase price.

The car we bought:

Opel Agila 1.0 Comfort 12
Options: Manual Air
Color: Dark Blue (Customized color)

When first driving the car suited us immediately. The high is you have a good view of the road. And with a consumption of 1 to 20 row you like to have an extra round. A real stadsautotje and it is also used as a 2nd car. The car is quite comfortable as the seats are good despite some flat seats. The power steering is very pleasant because we did miss the Gulf. Shifting is quite smooth although he sometimes tricky going into reverse. Where are we with the wave often had problems with starting the Opel always. But the best has to be the optional manual air conditioning. We have not looked. The performances are somewhat deteriorated. For example, the 3-cylinder agila of 0 to 100 in nearly 20 seconds. Actually the low performance are also fine again. At the Golf S you sometimes had to really look for it spurted forward. pity the small luggage, shopping is still there but it remains with.

All in all it's just a very nice car where we will enjoy for years.

PROBLEMS

  • May 13 2007 00:00

Only a faulty battery and routine maintenance course. But the car has only run a small 10 000 kilometers.

4.0
  • comfort 4.0
  • performance 3.0
  • reliability 4.0
  • cost 5.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? maybe

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • insufficient
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

Suzuki Celerio 1.0 Comfort (2015) review

23PerformanceSpeedsYear BuiltYear of purchaseKM-mode, when purchasingMileage last
Celerio 1.0 Comfort
5, Manual
2015
2015
9 km
18070 km
Average reader rating: 8.8 Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

selection and purchase

  • 9 km
  • August 25 2015 09:55

We were looking for an inexpensive, nice driving and most economical small five-door car with so much space as possible. Previously it had been decided only to use our brains in our choice.
Eligible non small Peugeot / Citroen / Toyota triplets and the Suzuki Alto (in our opinion really small back and in terms of luggage), nor the VW / Seat / Skoda triplets (I hate VW with its high prices and moderate quality).
Mitsubishi Space Star, Kia Picanto, Hyundai I10, Fiat Panda and Suzuki Celerio and possibly Suzuki Splash (the outlet model) did come into consideration .. the other makes small cars all fell off because they are more expensive with air conditioning.
We have these six cars a test drive and found the Suzuki Celerio most comfortable ride:
handy, easy, calm, clear and pretty comfortable. At 120km running engine, you only notice when strong acceleration, only 3000 rpm. On poor road surfaces and bumps the celerio drove the smoothest.
Because celerio offers inside and terms of luggage space and the most since the new modified Suzuki engine that it is by far the most economical, the choice must surely be this fall.
As to price in a version with air conditioning and automatic locking the celerio was also a very favorable choice (€ 10 995, =) and because the weight is very low overall operating costs are the lowest.
On balance: Most space, most comfortable ride and lowest cost!
Further positives for us were that there was at least a towing capacity of 400kg, not much but it made it possible to transport larger items with a trailer and to take the bike without problems on a bike rack.
With most small cars can not even agree.
The construction of the vehicle and the height of the driver's seat gives you a perfect overview of the traffic.
Last but not least, Suzuki brand you never have a problem with that you hear and read everywhere and our experience with two previous Suzukis.
It was therefore a wise choice: the Suzuki Celerio.

See you not with your mind but you feel you'll notice that the celerio is a rather meaningless design ... Well that's just the way, but fortunately we do not need a car to polish our self-esteem or to gain appreciation of other people.
For us it's just a means of transport like a bike. What matters is that it takes very little, runs nice and never causes problems. A nondescript model is totally ok.
We are very happy with our choice.

We have the car eventually (emailed photos for resale value) over the internet purchased at the Suzuki dealer in Eindhoven (very good experience). Price difference with our dealer in residence remained after 2nd "opportunity" € 1,000.
As extras we have rubbing strips, rear spoiler and a trailer hitch mount on leave.

first experiences

  • 3500 km
  • August 25 2015 09:57

After the car was delivered about three weeks later, it seemed to us whether this was stiffer suspension as last year's demo that we test drove. Should the factory settings have now been adapted ... ??? According to the dealer was not so. Meanwhile, we are used to it. It goes like on rails through the corners when you go harder and with normal use nothing understeer brand. But speed bumps over 40km is the maximum.
We have almost 3,500 kilometers driven.
Mileage I keep well in (parts each time driven by km's of liters) and it is a surprising one: 24.2 !!!!!

I never expected this. It is a measure of a fuel-efficient diesel. Unbelievable that this is for a gasoline car! Kudos to Suzuki.

Here I will tell you how we ride celerio because with 1:24'd think we thrift freaks who do not drive faster than 80km on the highway or something.
We normally ride with traffic, and try somewhat to follow the shift recommendations to the board computer. We drive 50,80,100 and 120km (not harder) where it is allowed (even with the bicycle rack and two bikes on the back, which occurs regularly).
Very fast acceleration and long high-speed driving we do. The Celerio you do in normal use hardly get above 3000 rpm!
With our previous car we usually Renault Kangoo 1.6 2007 consumption of 1: 13.5 with the same driving style.

The onboard computer can set you at any time, over 30 km driving, sees the actual consumption (1:18 or 1:30, etc.). This is very useful because that shows you exactly when consumption increases (rapid) increase, slopes, wind etc.

Not only positive things to say the following:
The standard speakers are only mediocre.
Like all light cars is higher celerio some wind sensitive but we have been through worse.
Beforehand I had read in a test car that the self-centering action of the controller would not be good and there was some reservations about, but while driving showed that really falling, and you were quickly used to it. You will not even notice anymore.
The only real drawback we found the lack of a spare tire, but yes that most other new cars too. For now, we have at least years free roadside assistance at home and abroad.
A disadvantage is the maintenance schedule. That would be more spacious.

complement

  • 4400 km
  • September 20 2015 21:45

I drive 18,000 km per year. The city is used and pieces of highway about 10km and occasionally a longer ride on the highway. With 3000 rpm, drive about 120 km / h. I am slightly above 3000 rpm, a few times when it is really necessary to insert or overtaking.
Furthermore, I often watch consumption on the board and try this little computer where it makes sense to keep the above 1:20. But I am not forced to, it must remain enjoyable ride.
If you want to go up very quickly, at the traffic light, the first road "fine cracks in the bin ..."Like most automotive journalists, then of course you get not 1:24.
But compared with this kind of behavior in other cars, he still seems to be still very economical rate.
Only real hard drive consumption (#) appears to be running: small engine, relatively high car and the gear ratios are not set up.
Which gear ratios are well focused on easy in his 3rd and 4th gears in city driving. The 1st and 2nd all you need to drive away (or "crawl" in the file).

(#) Soon we go to Berlin with the celerio and then I want to try out the highway use sometimes: one side of normal and relaxed driving in the other direction by driving considerably. After each run the same refueling. Wondering what it saves time and usage.

consumption ride to Berlin

  • 12923 km
  • April 5, 2016 22:26

I mentioned earlier that I "shortly" consumption wanted to test during a trip to Berlin. It became by circumstances later but now it happened.
The outward journey went from Nijmegen to Berlin with a speed of 130 -140 km. I drove an hour or 150 km. There are also long stretches where the road you can drive only 100 or 120 km. Consumption was 1: 18.6.
The way was Berlin to Schiedam at a speed of 120 km. Consumption was now 1: 22.6.
With this speed (120) you can use the celerio so for 90 euro back and forth to Berlin (to Paris and back for 57 euros and again)!
It also goes very quiet because the engine is only 3000 rpm and you do not hear him.

Not much else to say about the car. The drive is still good and there are no faults or complaints.

seal

  • 18070 km
  • July 15, 2016 21:34

We have celerio over a year and now 18,000 km traveled with complete satisfaction. The first overhaul is performed (cost € 165, =) About the car further to report any negative details. For us it is a real winner!
We meet a year on an average fuel consumption of just 1:23. (1:24 in summer and the winter falling to 1:22.)
I stop now provisionally exact usage tracking. The Celerio has certainly proved itself.

We just returned from a week in Normandy with the bikes on a bike rack on the back and have where possible and permitted 120 km driven. At the same speed without returning back from Berlin bikes we had a consumption of 1: 22.6 was measured. Bikes thus provide substantial resistance because now we measured a consumption of just 1:20.

4.0
  • comfort 4.0
  • performance 4.0
  • reliability 4.0
  • cost 4.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? Yes

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • insufficient
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

Volkswagen Jetta 1.4 TSI Highline Hybrid (2013) review

23PerformanceSpeedsYear BuiltYear of purchaseMileage last
Hybrid Jetta 1.4 TSI Highline
7, Sequential Machines
2013
2013
5500 km
Average reader rating: 5.4 Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

Experiences after the first week

  • 1200 km
  • May 16, 2013 00:13

After five long months of waiting, it was finally last week and if I change my prius for a Jetta Hybrid Highline.

First, a bit about my previous car.
The Prius was a stupid choice (aggregation) I made in my heart and mind with pain, the car I had before was because a Seat Altea XL Sport version with the 2.0 TDI 170hp diesel.

Besides the fact that I had thick dressed the prius (invoice amount 43 k) and he was a prius not completely hideous actually has this car surprised me.
He did his job well and comfortable.I was surprised by its technology had a net consumption (highway much but always between 1:16 and 1:20) long holiday trip 4000 km with a full load and highway germany even 1:20.

This car was not very slow speed and very quiet. Annoying though was the howling through the CVT, sporty drive and the fact that this car did everything very clinical with no emotion.

When choosing my Jetta, I thought as the Prius plug in but really wanted a little normal car back to me the 165 euros net aggregation was really worth.

The Jetta.
Highline version in the color silver frost

Factory Options:
Keyless entry, tinted glass rear parking sensors, sunroof.
Dealer Option (no addition:
Accessory blade rims 17"(Actually golf VII)
Leather upholstery truffle with black stitching
seat
IPod support for my daughter
Kenwood DNX521VBT navi-multimedia.
JBL MSA-1004 Amplifier 4x100 watts
MS62C JBL speakers in front and rear doors
Pioneer TSWX610A active subwoofer in trunk
Kenwood rear-view camera.
All together again so 43k and only 34 for addition.

7-5-2013 car retrieved. Had orders not able to drive because production had not yet started. The figures from the books had been good and this is confirmed by the driving experience. The car pulls like a bear and the DSG transmits power across nicely. The 1.4 TSI even has a nice sporty sound. In between accelerations he tackles very quickly and by the power it really is a very pleasant car to drive.
You feel that the car weighs 1500 kg but due to the battery on the rear axle are he is nicely balanced.

He has the highline version (slightly lower and sportier) a very good contact with the road and therefore nice and sporty driving feel (what did I miss the prius)
Consumption is currently 1:16 but also because I (and admiring colleagues) now regularly the gas completely at the bottom of stairs in the beginning.
At the moment I am so very happy with my new company car and frankly I find it strange that a car with so much power and driving pleasure only 14% addition. In my eyes the Jetta Toyota's considerable care in selling hybrids.

Finally, the audio and navi.
Very important to me but Jetta is no Dynaudio package so I composed this set himself and delivered them by the dealer. Have this very nicely built with the right cables and works perfectly. Had the Prius JBL upgrade but can not nearly match the sound I have now pretty full and deep bass as I am highs and midrange expect from JBL.
Because the aftermarket is all still just a little better quality as the standard upgrade kits that you can currently choose from the dealer price list. If you love music, this set is highly recommended.

- points at this time.
tilt mirror when reversing difficult to understand (it turned out that you had this program in each key)
afterwards leather is too tight making judgment seat belt light still passes.
Rattle in right rear (vibrates with nice bass and probably caused by installing speakers)
Nearly slowing to a stop and then go up again significantly (approaching intersection), the DSG has some difficulty to handle it all, my comparison purposes however CVT of Prius and picked up immediately but had entirely different disadvantages.

Start of the week make some more pictures and will share about week or two more experiences.

Experience after 4000 km

  • 4200 km
  • June 3, 2013 22:46

Thick 4200 km driven so time for an update.
Fuel consumption: Was hitherto blindly on indicating board computer. At last refueling (many km highway, no traffic jams) gave the onboard computer 1: 16.5 in. Did this recalculated (680km / 39 ltr) and come in 1: 17.4. Positive windfall so. Have yourself experience the first 10,000 km is not really a reference, so I wonder what it is about few months.

+ points so far.
Engine runs really delicious, chassis provides good contact with the road, Adaptive Headlights very fine, good seats and speed very quiet.

- points so far.
The DSG tray operating at normal driving saved, however, by a complex junction where you almost stopped to brake down and then quickly again want to drive through the box has a hard time and he reacted after swallowing some less smoothly as desired. This made the CVT of the Prius better.

The braking, switching between regenerative braking and normally does not work smoothly, with quiet brake feel when the regenerative braking constant pedal pressure. when the normal brakes than relax you feel the rembekrachtinging pull the pedal down. So it is quite difficult to inhibit pretty smooth because you always have a varying pedal pressure. Am now quite used to it so you go unnoticed compensate increasing. Here, however, is still to get a point.

Further still a very nice car and still very happy with my choice

Consumption

  • 5500 km
  • June 9, 2013 21:15

Car begins to slow economical. Perhaps because the new look a little low, and I ability less contact.
Last 3 refueling: 1: 16.5 - 1:17 - 1: 18.1
Average speed about 60 km / h so many highway and very little traffic.
Noticed that many b roads and city traffic, the hybrid better comes into its own and suits use above 1:20.

Consumption

  • 5500 km
  • June 9, 2013 21:16

Car begins to slow economical. Perhaps because the new look a little low, and I ability less contact.
Last 3 refueling: 1: 16.5 - 1:17 - 1: 18.1
Average speed about 60 km / h so many highway and very little traffic.
Noticed that many b roads and city traffic, the hybrid better comes into its own and suits use above 1:20.

4.5
  • comfort 4.0
  • performance 5.0
  • reliability 4.0
  • cost 4.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? Yes

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • insufficient
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

Mini Cooper (2016) review

14PerformanceSpeedsConstruction yearYear of purchaseMileage last
Cooper
6, Sequential Machines
2016
2016
33000 km
Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

A BMW in sheep's clothing

  • 515 km
  • September 4 2016 21:19

You do not drive so long in a BMW 330e, in my mind about the most desirable cars in its class if you can drive a company car, especially if you're in my case, only 7% have to count on (just in 2015 delivered) and then ... then comes a very nice new job in your path. But the company in question does not lease cars. Ai, which is a bit tough. But after sleeping a few nights and knowing that you will be compensated financially well a car is obviously not the reason not to go for a nice new job. So the BMW was out again.

But what then? Especially if you're a bit addicted to premium. The 330th assume would have been possible but it is expensive (because a lot of options) and the advantage of the 7% addition is gone. So that fell off. In other looked BMWs. Both new, as used, for example, a fine dressed-1 series. I am also a fan of youngtimers and also have good experience with it. But since I'm not a trader but as an employee I do not have the tax benefit with a youngtimer. Besides, how well youngtimers also be I know from experience that to touch it again she can be tricky if you lose a lot of mileage to move. So even for a moment doubted then a beautiful Mercedes CLS my path with only 50,000 kilometers on the clock, but I found apart from mentioned disadvantages also just a tad too immodest.

Then I just go and see what I can easily lease private. Literally everything I considered. Even a Fiat 500C with everything on it. Why not? I drive 90% of the time alone in the car. And I thought it was a funny idea. Despite my height is 1.96m I really fine in such Fiat, it drives well. Anyway ... ok ... it is very small. And base things like missing a cruise. So that fell off.

To my eye fell on the Mini. I always liked Minis wonderful. Actually I found the first retro model, which I always thought was the best delivered from 2001. Not too big, recognizable and close to the prototype has that 'stubborn speedometer in the middle etc. And delicious impractical, too. The second model, I still had a weekend with some 10 years ago. A weekend where I have fond memories of. Tasty carting that thing. That was slightly larger. But when I remember that I liked him again handed in after that weekend.

When the current model came out in 2014, I did have an opinion about it. Or judgment. Sample went too far! This was not a mini lake, too big. And the speedometer was finally disappeared in the middle of the dashboard! That is not possible. But still round but filled with multimedia. Bah I wrote.

Nothing is as changeable as a human being. Because I went so just stop by the dealership looking for my new car. Actually triggered by the new Clubman. I did look it kek his stubborn loopholes. And when I got into the car happened what so often happened in my car life: I was hit in my heart. What a nice thing. At a glance I saw: this car right! And what you see is that it is a premium product. Everything is so beautifully screwed together, with so much love for detail. And so willed. And the kilometer counter behind the steering wheel beautiful and the navigation screen in the middle suddenly bother me no more. And although no space miracle: both the hatchback and the Clubman can get along in space by. Especially the Clubman is just a nice sized car, also in the back.
So deeply in love, I left the dealership and I am beaten to configure. To discover that the Mini is downright expensive. Bah, whenever it is beautiful, it is expensive. What's new. The low prices are fine though. But it's just like BMW, are you going to add extras or price runs arrow quickly. And I love luxury. So there you go ...

Long I was convinced that it had to be the Clubman. Logically, I come from a BMW 3 series which is just a large car (what people say, with my 1.96 to sit still good people behind me, so spacious, not just on). Yet that does not become it. I test drive in an ordinary hatchback, a Cooper. And that ride was that I made my choice. This had to be him! I came back and gave a big smile the key to the seller. Spot on, I said! It was only a matter of choice. And Mini have LOTS choice. In terms of model, motorisation, color scheme, striping, etc.

At the time I wanted to order there was a special edition of which would only be available as a hatchback. The Marylebone. With striping funny, beautiful cross punch leather interior, Harmon Kardon sound system and the brilliant sunroof. Many discount. I have been thinking a good look, but knowing I will not often people in my situation on board, I decided I just go for the hatchback. The Clubman I find beautiful but it's so much money per month to me that is not worth it. And let's be honest: the hatchback I like most to see. So nice and thick! Especially in the performance as I ordered it.

Below is the specifications of my square standing on its wheels Cooper:

Mini Cooper Hatchback
That means the 1.5 3-pitter 136 hp

- Color Pepper White (what looks like cream, tasty retro)
- black roof
- automatic transmission
- Chile package
- Wired package
- Serious business package
- Mini Soda Sports steering wheel
- Spoke alloy wheels chrome 18"
- comfort access
- Chrome line exterior accents
- Chrome Line interior accents
- Visibility package (heated windshield)
- panorama glass roof
- Front armrest
- Comfort seats with leather upholstery
- storage package
- Electrically heated front seats
- Headlining anthracite
- Interior Panels piano black
- Mini Excitement pack
- Rain and light sensor
- automatic air conditioning
- cruise control
- Onboard computer
- light Package
- LED for mistlmapen
- LED koplmapen with enhanced features
- navigation system Professional
- Harmon Kardon Sound System
- Mob car phone + USB Audio
- mini Connected
- Min Driving Modes
- Park Distance Control rear
- Mini Connected XL

Connoisseurs will know that packets as Chile contain a bundle of options specified below. Anyway, not so interesting. This car is so good in the options. Things I have not taken the headup display, even though it suited perfectly in my previous car. But this word to use again, he puts the Mini from the dashboard and is not projected on the windshield. I think an ugly face and wonder if it works with my height (not tested). I must admit that I was a bit wrong, you quickly get used to that luxury. But so be it. Parking sensors for either, and behind them I could miss just sitting in one of the packages. Reverse Camera ditto: not necessary.

For a day or 5 I have the car, the first 500 km on it. Too early too hard decisions so. I'm still in love. Because I am. Not only do I think look the car is extremely beautiful, and it will not really change, he also runs so delicious. As a BMW. But different. Very direct. The steering is almost heavy with the small but beautiful steering wheel, but I like it. In driving mode, the sport is all right. The machine turns fast and smooth, just not as nice as the eighth stage in my third but still very good. The engine is basically an engine: powerful and with a nice hum. But still. You do not notice it really a 3-pitter is unless it is idling. Driving there is still a bit cautious but I think if you chase him significantly that it is quite a nice thing.
The car is pretty stiff this (beautiful) 18" rims but not TOO. In a residential area do not go too hard (not anyway!) Especially at thresholds, but on ordinary roads I would call it more directly than stiff. It is obviously not a limo, it is a relatively small car. But I think it's balanced. Time will tell how it is on long journeys.

And space: this is obviously not a very big car. Small but he is certainly not! The Mini is a bit between a Golf and Polo. Up front, I'm perfect. And I measure 1.96m. So no small man. I'm nice, the seats are perfect, give good support, are firm but comfortable. Lovely. In the back there is my height, of course, not much room. But it is not so that the seat against the back seat is on. If anything I inschik can someone so good behind for shorter trips. And the backrest of the front seat is hollow in order to win centimeters in front of the rear seat passengers. The trunk is small but good use for home garden and kitchen use, errands. With an oh so handy storage space under the trunk floor.

Things I enjoy all of it is now sunroof, delicious. The beautiful chairs and upholstery. And Harmon Kardon sound system. The rest I must all still going to find out once and experience. Consumption I can not tell much about. I'm going refueling and estimates the first tank at about 1 in 15.

As I drove 10,000 km I sign up for the first real experiences.

Minioten

  • 10500 km
  • November 19, 2016 22:55

Thus, the first 10,000 km is over. Much faster than expected. I leased this car 25,000 km per year, but if this momentum by going than there are at least 40,000. Is that bad? Absolutely not! Because if there's anything I can say (or affirm) it is that this is a great driver's car. Every kilometer is enjoying. In very few ways set this car disappoint me. And given the number of kilometers I can also say with certainty that this is certainly not a shopping car. He drives really like a big car, I sit there with my excellent in 1.95, but without any. Ok, if someone needs to sit behind me (which rarely happens) then I closer together. Then I sit obviously not as spacious, but for shorter trips is doing fine. And I'm not talking about 5 km. In that position I can fine and comfortable one hour drive.
The boot is small but very practical. Stuff that I stuck in I lie, I stopped under the floor (there's a nice space). The rest is for weekly home garden and kitchen use (especially groceries) fine!
As in all a very practical car this. He is on the way as a house. Is stiff but not uncomfortable. In driving mode " Sport " he will be very tight but use occasionally. In the other modes, there is good balance between comfort and sportiness.

What makes driving more so pleasant? The quality of all materials used! The interior is a delight. The magnificent handlebar with thick edge and beautiful leather, the dashboard is beautifully crafted with beautiful and gorgeous switches clocks, special lighting that's doing night in lights, beautiful leather, the black sky ... I can as a moment get on. For people who are not so many cars have perhaps not mean much, I enjoy every day of it. And if I get in my car driving enthusiasts than they equalize the remark: What a beautiful car. The slide / sunroof is delicious. In the beautiful month of September, I enjoyed the ride open. And Harmon Kardon system is great. Not as good as in my previous BMW, but does more than fine.

Motor I am very satisfied. With some caveats. The three-cylinder engine is a wonderfully bright. And the car is downright fast. The caveat is that you do not always experience that. Because the power is gradually comes into. But he drags the car to be fast at highly illegal speeds. Only the real push is still a little way in the back. So the perception is that it is fast. But in just the 100 more than 8 seconds to go is definitely fast! The reason it feels different has to do with torque. That's not crazy high, and torque still largely determines that feeling. Anyway, the engine meets so well in terms of performance. The sound I find beautiful. Tasty roll when you flush. Very quiet on the highway. The caveat here is that he does not run idle so beautiful. A common shortcoming of a three-pitter. But for example, file-driving it is a bit irritating. You can hear and feel the imbalance. That's too bad. And what does detract from the comfort. But that's also pretty much the only thing I have to complain. Consumption is neat. I am now at about 1: 15.5. I had expected something more economical and I want to find what happens when winter comes.
The automatic 6 gear changes flawlessly and without you noticing it. Fractional less well than the unsurpassed 8-bake (who is in the Cooper S). But the difference is small and in daily practice is a lovely tray. I would not want to be without! So relaxed.

Finally, the multi-media system. I knew it all BMW. And it works superfine. I did some stuff with Spotify. That worked well but since an update of Mini Connected anymore. Maybe I need an update on the Multi Media System. But otherwise everything works flawlessly. The controller I is not read in a convenient spot. I have no such problem. And I use the voice control system regularly (phone, navigation) and it works fine after pressing the button. Top system. Very expensive, but you get quality.

Mini drive is a way of life. I headed already "Minioten" and that's because I've learned that there is a very large group of enthusiastic mini-drivers are in contact with each other to share their enthusiasm. What brand is it? Not so much. It says something about what makes the Mini car, but it is a brand with emotion. And I get it now. I even met with other Mini drivers. And without exception they all ride Mini with his heart. Overdone? That is an opinion or perhaps a judgment. For me it is a work of clarity. And I hope to make it long. At 25,000 km I sign again.

Mini = Maxi

  • 33000 km
  • June 19, 2017 23:03

33,000 km are over. And what a delight. Time for an update. If you read the first record you know how I ended up in this car. And I must say that I still absolutely do not regret my choice. This is one great all-rounder. Many people still get confused by the name yet (Mini) Mini but is more of a brand than an indication of the size of the car. Ok, it's not a big car. But he is certainly not small. And if you look where I bought the car to 90% business use, I will come to nothing. If I have to disregard co-drivers back is I really spacious. Many people do not believe this but it's true. And I'm 1.96m tall. The chairs, I have the luxury variant, are very good. I just returned from a weekend return Paris and I get after a trip fresh from the Mini. Also, the handling is more than acceptable. In sport mode, it is more rigid (but that's the idea behind the driving mode) but in normal range and he was nicely balanced.

The engine also suits me perfectly. Nice compromise between sufficient power and performance and fuel economy. I am now on a consumption somewhere between 1 in 15 and 1 in 16. I think I have a whole year close to 16 bowl because it's summer and he is much more economical than in the winter. In Paris I noticed that if you drive much traffic that it is quite slurping more. Then you are quickly close to the one at 13. But I drive mostly highway. Machines also the way and 6 bake delicious. Never feel that he picks the wrong gear, fast switching. Fine. In Paris I was indeed with the whole family, including two daughters who are both around 1.80. Then I have something closer together but believe me, I'm fine. And to park this is obviously a great car: nice and short.

Nothing to complain? Of course it is. The expensive navigatiesytseem not current (shame) and sends you right in big cities with the greatest ease of one-way streets or even a bus lane. Regularly I need google maps. That's at. Why not this system? By and large, further it will hear a particulate system. Stunning screen, clear indicia. But given the price it should be perfect. And that's not it. Furthermore, the interior annoying small and the system which pushes forward the seats (I have a 3-door) downright clumsy. The memory does not work so well with getrut seat reset so I forgive her but could be better. And, but that's an exception: why just say that plastic making glove compartment of cheaper plastic? The rest of the interior is a delight! Fine materials, real premium. But is it clear that there is saved. Dom. That said, I can consciously enjoy the incredibly beautiful dashboard with racy clocks, beautiful leather steering wheel, the beautiful leather etc.

Been in all an excellent choice. And I'm happy to continue riding in the cart.

4.5
  • comfort 4.0
  • performance 5.0
  • reliability 5.0
  • cost 4.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? Yes

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • insufficient
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

Honda Civic 1.6i LS (2001) review

3PerformanceSpeedsConstruction yearYear of purchaseKM-mode, when purchasingMileage last
Civic 1.6i LS
5, Manual
2001
2012
65800 km
100000 km
Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

+ purchase inspection RDW

  • 68500 km
  • April 16 2012 15:52

After a bad experience with my first non-Japanese (after 1 Daihatsu, one Honda Civic and Honda Accord Aerodeck 1), a VW Passat Variant, so look out quickly to a Japanese, no less than a Honda Civic. Eventually through Marketplace passed a '01 model with 1.6 (quite rare in a 5-door) with only 65,800 km. the counter (arguably, first hand, all bills available). After a test run super excited; rides wonderfully spicy, tasty light control, so proceeded to purchase. The purchase price of 2.650, - was approximately 600 euros for inspection at RDW, BPM and aanschap license plates, but a week later I could finally drive !! What a delight after the Passat which was still not perfect despite many repairs ...! In a subsequent review more experiences .....!

pleases !!!

  • 68500 km
  • April 16 2012 16:02

Meanwhile, the first 2,500 km it down with the Civic, and made the first charge. 2 Car Damage remedied (straightening) and bought very nice alloy wheels, and there leave immediately fit new tires. 16" like fine enough conveniences and excellent handling. Unfortunately appeared first caliper to leak, so it replaced a 150 euro (and immediately re-install new brake pads). Driving in the car remains a delight; about 2 weeks, see how he takes a trip to Denmark)

Shortly before the MOT immediately carry out a major overhaul, I think it drives even better with new spark plugs and filters.

To be continued....!

the ton!

  • 100000 km
  • November 12, 2014 15:52

Yeah ...... now almost 14 years old but only recently passed the ton. Quite an achievement! And still the Civic like excellent, even during holidays to Denmark (5 persons + luggage for a week) and Croatia (4 people + luggage for two weeks!). In Croatia whole pieces 150-160 ridden without problems, car did not budge. Recently (on my own) have tapped 187 (on navigation calibrated so!), So engine seems healthy.

Repairs continue hitherto confined to wheel bearing, shock absorbers and rear drive shaft cover and turn 1x per year. What now is faulty, central locking (remote control, and previously was not it right, now left back even more, using the key).


I keep going well in the Civic, until I have saved enough for a young Civic, perhaps the station which has just been released!

4.5
  • comfort 4.0
  • performance 4.0
  • reliability 5.0
  • cost 5.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? Yes

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • inadequate
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

Citroen C1 VTi 68 Feel (2017) review

PerformanceSpeedsYear BuiltYear of purchaseKM-mode, when purchasingMileage last
C1 VTi 68 Feel
5, Manual
2017
2017
10 km
3600 km
Disclaimer MyReview

The descriptions and comments in the section Myreview car based on personal opinions and experiences of users. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') can not be held responsible for the contents or possible consequences. In Myreview car will be placed both good and bad experiences. The editors may expressions that do not meet the rules of conduct or unlawful modify or delete at all times.

It is not allowed without permission of Sanoma to use the information for Myreview Auto or to spread through other media.

Meets fine, costs little - but -

  • 3600 km
  • July 30, 2017 20:50

With a job at the prospect of walking / biking distance but we occasionally have (irregular) need a car was considering to adopt the discounted Citroen C1.

Unlike previous cars, unlike the Volvo 850 2.5 we had here. Keeping in mind: Low consumption, low expenses, low maintenance and enough comfort here in the Netherlands we said yes and a little later the C1 in the street.

Equipment / practical
Air conditioning, Bluetooth, electric windows, radio, privacy glass has almost everything I could wish for. Cruise control and electrically operated mirrors I miss quite a bit.

The seats are actually fine and groceries & small bags fit perfectly in the trunk. The steering is not to get to you and not really adjust far up making it a bit low on the legs is with us.

To drive
For a small car, I think the C1 very mature. 130 on the highway, also longer pieces is really not very tiring and uncomfortable. He does send light but not as dismal as the new Twingo where have driven in (this I found incidentally as a whole a huge setback, except appearance). Switching, link, braking just everything is very easy. The average consumption up to now as measured at the pump is a 1: 19.3 for the first 3500km. This is also with running-in, air-conditioning and to +/- 130 on the highway where it may. Not bad!

Are you with two or three people and some luggage on board, there is a wind like you'll notice: For the Netherlands, this car is fine, but he comes to power shortage really going to go on vacation. Would this not go to the south of France or ski ride. There, Citroën / Toyota / Peugeot'm also not designed for.

Problem?
What just very disappointing, at regular speeds below 80-100km / h the engine jerks. Sometimes quite violent too, especially between 40 and 80 this is very annoying. I understand that the engine is not as smooth as the 2.5-liter five-cylinder from the previous car, but you do not expect. I read in several places that this is the new Euro 6 engine. I have more than six months before the C1 came into the test drive in a Aygo and had this not shock, I think of me now, unfortunately, that it might still have the old - had engine - not shocking. I still hope to find a solution.

The C1 like it very much, but the shock bothers me very much. We already Euro98 BP and Shell V-Power tanked but this did not help at all. I'll post an update if there is!

* Features a 2 because of the shock, reliability put on enough, I can not judge.

3.5
  • comfort 3.0
  • performance 2.0
  • reliability 3.0
  • cost 5.0
  • Would you buy a car from this brand? maybe

Give your opinion about writing style and usability. At least five received ratings, the average rating will be displayed.

  • bad
  • insufficient
  • Enough
  • good
  • excellent

In the wild: Ford Model T (1919)

41Vandaag by far the oldest participant in this section! Thanks to AutoWeek reader Rolf Mak week we have a Ford Model T in 1919 on the stage!

The Ford Model T - also known as T Ford - can be seen as the first 'achievable' car. Henry Ford perfected the assembly line, by which the production cost could be drastically reduced. Where cars previously purely for the rich were intended, the Ford Model T offered for the middle class. A few days after the unveiling of the model already 15,000 orders were placed.

The Model T was produced between 1908 and 1927. This copy dates from 1919 and is found in our country since 2010. Under the hood - like all Model T's - a 2.9-liter four-cylinder metering, good for 20 hp. It is sometimes thought that the Model T Ford's first car was, but models like the Model A, Model N and S preceded him. After the Model T Henry incidentally again started with the letter A, as he felt that the new model was so innovative that he wanted to start from scratch. In total, around 15 million T Models produced.

Ford Model T ...

  • I feel fantastic
  • I feel pretty fun
  • does not do me much
  • I find nothing but
  • I feel terrible
Vote View archive

Ford Model T ...

  • I find fantastic 76.6%
  • I feel pretty fun 16.5%
  • I am not much 4.8%
  • I find nothing but 0.7%
  • I feel awful 1.4%
Number stemmen727Bekijk archive

Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) Specifications

Opel Lotus OmegaOpel Lotus OmegaIn 1990, Opel presents the spectacular Lotus Omega. As the name implies, the super-fast sedan was developed by former GM subsidiary Lotus. Just as the former Ford Lotus Cortina Lotus Omega must combine the performance of a sports car with room for four people. The basis is formed by the Omega. The Opel-six-cylinder in-line has been pierced by the Lotus technicians to 3.6 liters and provided with two turbochargers with cooling. The heavy duty six-speed gearbox also comes from the Lotus-developed Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1. Lotus Omega is huge on the outside, because of the large spoilers front and rear, the wheel arches and side skirts. Also special wheels are mounted. The 24-valve engine pushes no less than 377 bhp. Thus the top of the Lotus Omega is in less than 5.5 seconds to 100 km / h, is as high as 280 km / h (hence Opel does like Porsche on the gentlemen's agreement that German cars are not faster than 250 km / h run) . The Lotus Omega is therefore a direct competitor to the more subdued stylized BMW M5 and Mercedes 500E. In Britain, the car comes as Vauxhall Lotus Carlton. In 1992, the curtain falls for the fastest Opel ever, after 950 units built.Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) Specifications

Specifications Opel Lotus Omega

Type-
construction Year1990-1992
build6 cil., Line
Displacement3615 cc
Fuelgasoline
drivingbehind
Power377 hp / 5200 rpm
couple568 Nm / 4200 rpm
Length468 cm
Width193 cm
Height143 cm
wheelbase273 cm
Mass1663 kg
Top speed280 km / h
Acceleration5.4 s
Price-
production Number950
Classic Opel Lotus Omega (1990-1992) Specifications More Opel Lotus Omega:specifications| Occasions| model PageMore Opel:brand Pages

Opel Agila 1.0-12V Comfort (2001) gjennomgang

2implementeringhastigheterByggeårKjøpsårkilometer~~POS=TRUNC siste
Agila 1.0-12V Comfort
5, manuell
2001
2001
9630 km
Gjennomsnittlige leser vurdering: 6.4 Ansvarsfraskrivelse MyReview

Beskrivelsene og kommentarer i avsnittet Myreview bil basert på personlige meninger og erfaringer fra brukere. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') kan ikke holdes ansvarlig for innholdet eller mulige konsekvenser. I Myreview bilen vil bli plassert både gode og dårlige erfaringer. Redaktørene kan uttrykk som ikke oppfyller reglene for oppførsel eller ulovlig endre eller slette hele tiden.

Det er ikke tillatt uten tillatelse fra Sanoma å bruke informasjonen for Myreview Auto eller til å spre seg gjennom andre medier.

OPPLEVELSER

  • 13. mai 2007 00:00

Når vår Volkswagen Golf S 5 dører 1980 ble avvist i 2001, var vi egentlig på utkikk etter en annen bil. En liten bil ble foretrukket. Og siden små biler andre hånden relativt dyrt å kjøpe er vi så for en ny. Og når vi gikk inn i denne Opel Agila bump ... Ikke hyggelig, ikke raskt, men hva et rom. Og siden vi er ikke små mennesker er fortsatt i sin pris en en av de mest romslige biler. Agila er iedentiek Suzuki Wagon R. Grunnen til at vi hadde kjøpt en fordi Agila Suzuki Wagon R (da) om 1,0 var tilgjengelig og som gjorde det for dyrt. Vi kjøpte oppdro ham i tid fordi bilen er et par måneder etter vår kjøpesummen.

Bilen vi kjøpte:

Opel Agilas 1,0 komfort 12
Alternativer: Manuell Air
Farge: Mørkeblå (Egendefinerte farger)

Når først kjører bilen passer oss umiddelbart. Den høye er at du har en god oversikt over veien. Og med et forbruk på 1-20 raden du liker å ha en ekstra runde. En ekte stadsautotje og det er også brukt som en andre bil. Bilen er ganske behagelig som setene er gode til tross for noen flate seter. Servostyring er veldig hyggelig fordi vi savner golfen. Skiftende er ganske glatt selv om han noen ganger vanskelig å gå i revers. Hvor er vi med bølgen ofte hatt problemer med å starte Opel alltid. Men det beste er å være den valg manuelt klimaanlegg. Vi har ikke sett. Forestillingene er noe forverret. For eksempel, er det 3-sylinder agila fra 0 til 100 i nesten 20 sekunder. Egentlig den lave ytelsen er også greit igjen. På Golf S du noen ganger måtte virkelig se etter det sprutet fremover. synd den lille bagasjen, shopping der fortsatt, men det er fortsatt med.

Alt i alt er det bare en veldig fin bil der vi vil nyte i mange år.

PROBLEMER

  • 13. mai 2007 00:00

Bare en defekt batteri og rutinemessig vedlikehold kurset. Men bilen har bare kjøre en liten 10 000 kilometer.

4.0
  • komfort 4.0
  • ytelse 3,0
  • pålitelighet 4.0
  • koste 5,0
  • Vil du kjøpe en bil fra dette merket? kanskje

Gi din mening om å skrive stil og brukervennlighet. Minst fem fikk karakterer, gjennomsnittlig rating vil bli vist.

  • dårlig
  • utilstrekkelig
  • nok
  • god
  • utmerket

Suzuki Celerio 1.0 Comfort (2015) gjennomgang

23implementeringhastigheterByggeårKjøpsårKM-modus, når du kjøperkilometer~~POS=TRUNC siste
Celerio 1.0 Comfort
5, manuell
2015
2015
9 km
18070 km
Gjennomsnittlige leser vurdering: 8.8 Ansvarsfraskrivelse MyReview

Beskrivelsene og kommentarer i avsnittet Myreview bil basert på personlige meninger og erfaringer fra brukere. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV ( 'Sanoma') kan ikke holdes ansvarlig for innholdet eller mulige konsekvenser. I Myreview bilen vil bli plassert både gode og dårlige erfaringer. Redaktørene kan uttrykk som ikke oppfyller reglene for oppførsel eller ulovlig endre eller slette hele tiden.

Det er ikke tillatt uten tillatelse fra Sanoma å bruke informasjonen for Myreview Auto eller til å spre seg gjennom andre medier.

valg og kjøp

  • 9 km
  • 25 august 2015 09:55

Vi var på utkikk etter en billig, fin kjøring og mest økonomiske liten femdørs bil med så mye plass som mulig. Tidligere hadde det blitt bestemt bare å bruke hjernen vår i vårt valg.
Kvalifiserte ikke små Peugeot / Citroen / Toyota trillinger og Suzuki Alto (etter vår mening veldig lite tilbake og i form av bagasje), og heller ikke VW / Seat / Skoda trillinger (jeg hater VW med sine høye priser og moderat kvalitet).
Mitsubishi Space Star, Kia Picanto, Hyundai I10, Fiat Panda og Suzuki Celerio og muligens Suzuki Splash (uttaket modell) kom i betraktning .. den andre gjør små biler alle falt av fordi de er dyrere med air condition.
Vi har disse seks biler en prøvetur og fant Suzuki Celerio mest komfortabel tur:
hendig, enkel, rolig, klar og ganske behagelig. På 120km motor som går, du bare legger merke til når sterk akselerasjon, bare 3000 rpm. På dårlige veier og støt den celerio kjørte den jevneste.
Fordi celerio tilbyr innvendig og når det gjelder bagasjeplass og de fleste siden det nye modifiserte Suzuki motor som det er langt den mest økonomiske, må valget sikkert være denne høsten.
Som å prise i en versjon med luftkondisjonering og automatisk låsing av celerio var også en meget gunstig valg (€ 10 995, =) og fordi vekten er meget lav samlede driftskostnadene er lavest.
På saldo: Most plass, mest komfortabel kjøring og lavest kostnad!
Ytterligere positive for oss var at det var minst en slepekapasitet på 400kg, ikke mye, men det gjorde det mulig å frakte større gjenstander med en trailer, og for å ta sykkelen uten problemer på et sykkelstativ.
Med de fleste små biler kan ikke engang enige.
Byggingen av kjøretøyet og høyden på førersetet gir deg en perfekt oversikt over trafikken.
Sist men ikke minst, Suzuki merke du aldri ha et problem med at du hører og leser overalt og vår erfaring med to tidligere Suzukis.
Det var derfor et klokt valg: Suzuki Celerio.

Se deg ikke med tankene dine, men du føler at du vil merke at celerio er en ganske meningsløs design ... Vel det er bare slik, men heldigvis vi trenger ikke en bil å polere vår selvfølelse eller å få forståelse for andre mennesker.
For oss er det bare et transportmiddel som en sykkel. Det som betyr noe er at det tar veldig lite, kjører fint og aldri skaper problemer. En ubestemmelig modell er helt ok.
Vi er veldig fornøyd med vårt valg.

Vi har bilen til slutt (mailet bilder for annenhåndsverdi) over internett kjøpt på Suzuki forhandler i Eindhoven (veldig god erfaring). Prisforskjellen med vår forhandler i bolig igjen etter andre "muligheter" € 1000.
Som statister har vi ribber, hekkspoiler og en trailer stikk montere på permisjon.

første erfaringer

  • 3500 km
  • 25 august 2015 09:57

Etter at bilen ble levert ca tre uker senere, virket det til oss om dette var stivere fjæring som fjorårets demo som vi testkjørte. Skulle fabrikkinnstillinger har nå blitt tilpasset ... ??? Ifølge giveren var ikke slik. I mellomtiden er vi vant til det. Det går som på skinner gjennom svingene når du går hardere og med normal bruk noe understyring merkevare. Men fartsdumper enn 40 km er det maksimale.
Vi har nesten 3500 kjørte kilometer.
Kilometer jeg holde godt på (deler hver gang drevet av km er av liter), og det er en overraskende en: 24,2 !!!!!

Jeg aldri forventet dette. Det er et mål for en drivstoff-effektive diesel. Utrolig at dette er for en bensin bil! Kudos til Suzuki.

Her vil jeg fortelle deg hvordan vi ri celerio fordi med en: 24'd tror vi sparsommelighet freaks som ikke kjøre fortere enn 80 km på motorveien eller noe.
Vi vanligvis rir med trafikk, og prøv noe å følge skift anbefalinger til styret datamaskinen. Vi kjører 50,80,100 og 120 km (ikke hardere) hvor det er lov (selv med sykkelstativ og to sykler på baksiden, noe som skjer med jevne mellomrom).
Veldig rask akselerasjon og lange høyhastighetskjøring vi gjør. Den Celerio du gjør i normal bruk får neppe over 3000 rpm!
Med vår forrige bilen vi vanligvis Renault Kangoo 1.6 2007 forbruk på 1: 13.5 med samme kjørestil.

Den integrerte datamaskinen kan sette deg til enhver tid, over 30 km kjøring, ser det faktiske forbruket (01:18 eller 01:30, etc.). Dette er svært nyttig fordi det viser deg nøyaktig når forbruket øker (rask) øker, bakker, vind osv

Ikke bare positive ting å si følgende:
Standarden høyttalerne er bare middelmådig.
Som alle lette biler er høyere celerio litt vind sensitiv, men vi har vært gjennom verre.
På forhånd hadde jeg lest i en test bil som selvsentrering av kontrolleren ikke ville være bra, og det var noen reservasjoner om, men under kjøring viste at virkelig faller, og du ble raskt vant til det. Du vil ikke engang merke lenger.
Den eneste virkelige ulempen vi fant mangel på et reservehjul, men ja som de fleste andre nye biler også. For nå har vi minst år gratis veihjelp i inn- og utland.
En ulempe er den vedlikeholdsplan. Det ville være mer romslig.

komplement

  • 4400 km
  • 20 september 2015 21:45

Jeg kjører 18 000 km i året. Byen er brukt og deler av motorveien ca 10km og av og til en lengre tur på motorveien. Med 3000 rpm, kjør ca 120 km / t. Jeg er litt over 3000 rpm, noen ganger når det virkelig er nødvendig å sette inn eller forbikjøring.
Videre har jeg ofte se forbruket på brettet og prøve denne lille datamaskinen der det er fornuftig å holde over 01:20. Men jeg er ikke tvunget til, må det være hyggelig tur.
Hvis du ønsker å gå opp veldig raskt, i lyskrysset, første vei "fint sprekker i bin ..."Som de fleste motorjournalister, så selvfølgelig får du ikke 01:24.
Men sammenlignet med denne typen atferd i andre biler, likevel synes han å være fortsatt svært økonomisk hastighet.
Eneste virkelige harddisken forbruk (#) ser ut til å være i gang: liten motor, relativt høy bil og girutvekslinger er ikke satt opp.
Hvilke girutvekslinger er godt fokusert på enkel i sin 3. og 4. gir i bykjøring. Den første og andre alt du trenger for å kjøre bort (eller "gjennomgå" i filen).

(#) Snart går vi til Berlin med celerio og deretter ønsker jeg å prøve ut motorveien bruk noen ganger: én side av normalt og avslappet kjøring i motsatt retning ved å kjøre betraktelig. Etter hvert kjøre samme tanking. Lurer på hva det sparer tid og bruk.

forbruk tur til Berlin

  • 12923 km
  • 5 april 2016 22:26

Jeg nevnte tidligere at jeg "kort tid" forbruket ville teste under en tur til Berlin. Det ble etter omstendighetene senere, men nå er det skjedd.
Utreisen gikk fra Nijmegen til Berlin med en hastighet på 130 -140 km. Jeg kjørte en time eller 150 km. Det er også lange strekninger der veien kan du kjøre bare 100 eller 120 km. Forbruket var 1: 18,6.
Veien var Berlin til Schiedam med en hastighet på 120 km. Forbruket var nå 1: 22,6.
Med denne hastigheten (120) kan du bruke celerio så for 90 euro og tilbake til Berlin (til Paris og tilbake for 57 euro og igjen)!
Det går også veldig stille fordi motoren er bare 3000 rpm og du ikke høre ham.

Ikke mye annet å si om bilen. Stasjonen er fortsatt god, og det er ingen feil eller klager.

sel

  • 18070 km
  • 15 juli 2016 21:34

Vi har celerio over et år, og nå 18000 km reiste med tilfredshet. Den første overhaling utføres (koster € 165, =) Om bilen videre til å rapportere eventuelle negative detaljer. For oss er det en virkelig vinner!
Vi møter i året på en gjennomsnittlig drivstofforbruk på bare 1:23. (01:24 om sommeren og om vinteren faller til 01:22.)
Jeg stopper nå foreløpig presis sporing av bruk. Den Celerio har sikkert vist seg.

Vi har nettopp returnert fra en uke i Normandie med sykler på et sykkelstativ på ryggen og har der det er mulig og tillatt 120 km kjørt. På samme hastighet uten å returnere tilbake fra Berlin sykler hadde vi et forbruk på 1: 22,6 ble målt. Sykler gir dermed betydelig motstand fordi nå har vi målt et forbruk på bare 1:20.

4.0
  • komfort 4.0
  • ytelse 4,0
  • pålitelighet 4.0
  • koste 4,0
  • Vil du kjøpe en bil fra dette merket? ja

Gi din mening om å skrive stil og brukervennlighet. Minst fem fikk karakterer, gjennomsnittlig rating vil bli vist.

  • dårlig
  • utilstrekkelig
  • nok
  • god
  • utmerket

Driven: Porsche Macan GTS

15Skjermbildet ble du sikkert har lagt merke til at det var et hull i Macan programmet, nemlig mellom S og Turbo. Dette gapet er nå helt Porsche tradisjon, fylt med Macan GTS.

Under panseret er en 3,0 V6 med to turboladere, som med sine 360 ​​hk nøyaktig mellom de to andre i sittende (S: 340 hk, Turbo, 400 hk). På utsiden, er å anerkjenne GTS til de svarte 20-tommers hjul og alle typer svarte detaljer. Innvendig er de vakre sportsseter dekket umiddelbart.

Kraften blir tilført via en 7-trinns PDK overført til alle fire hjul og sprint til 100 km / t forårsaker GTS på 4,8 sekunder. Han har rundt større bremseskiver og PASM (Porsche Active Suspension Management) er standard på GTS.

Det kan ikke anbefales så vanskelig at Macan GTS er en ekstremt sportslig kjøre SUVer. Motoren reagerer spontant på gassen og lyd, takket være tilpassede eksos, akkurat som du ville gjort i en bil som dette forventer. Den justerbare fjæring demping og gjør det mulig å være rimelig komfortabel eller bare lese sporty måte.

Over kontroll du gjøre Porsche for lite til å si; Macan sender også direkte og god tilbakemelding. Total, et hyggelig og velkomment tillegg til programmet, for de som finner noe å bare S og Turbo bite for mye. Billig er ikke GTS, med sin pris på 107.000 euro, er han svært nær Turbo, som koster 109.000 euro. Årsak: bpm, delvis på grunnlag av CO2.
 

Den fulle driving inntrykk med Porsche Macan GTS lese i autoweek 49, fra 02.12 i butikkene.